Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sherry V. Chidwick's avatar

Julie, you are my friend and I respect you. But I have to admit, I still struggle with a post like this. I still cringe at the notion that he helped "wherever he could," "as much as possible," "until help arrives" and "to ensure it doesn't get physical, today" (which implies it does get physical other times).

You gave the caveat that Jesus doesn't interfere with free will, and there are natural consequences to people's actions, so that is why Jesus sometimes can't help. But it just seems so inconsistent, like the small print at the end of a pharmaceutical ad: "Individual results may vary."

It seems too easy for the survivors to praise Jesus' hand of protection while the victims--the ones who don't survive, and the ones who love them--stay silent. I know this the oldest question in the book, but I am admitting I don't have any answers. It's a real faith crisis for me sometimes.

No posts

Ready for more?